With the acquisitions of Steve Nash and now Antawn Jamison,
the Lakers have addressed two of their major concerns, the need for a true PG
and improving the bench scoring. The
bench scoring in particular was frustrating last season as it seemed as though
there were plenty of games where the Lakers would get about 10-15 points from
the bench. The midseason move of Derek Fisher to get Jordan Hill wasn’t
initially a trade that was welcomed by the fans, since Fisher was a beloved
Laker and friend of Kobe Bryant. It only
was more aggravating to see the newcomer ride the pine, leaving myself and
Laker nation to wonder why Fisher was dealt. Finally Hill got his chance to
make an impact and he made sure to make the most of his opportunity. In one of
the most exciting games of the regular season, the infamous Elbow Game, the
Lakers defeated the Thunder in double overtime. Hill was a major difference
maker with 14 points and 15 rebounds in 35 minutes of actions. His tenacity and
effort was invigorating for a Laker team that looked dead in the water.
Despite falling down to earth in a sense, Hill won over the
hearts of Laker fans and there seems to be a general consensus that he should
be re-signed. I was able to come up with 3 major reasons as to why Hill should
be re-signed and given a good amount of actions as one of the first reserves
off the bench.
1. Help Bench
Easily the number 1 reason to try and keep Jordan Hill is
that he can add to the bench. Even with the addition of Antawn Jamison, the
bench still needs help in a big way. Jordan has shown energy that this team was
lacking and if he can be a guy who can get 7-10 points and 5-7 rebounds in
15-20 minutes that would be a blessing.
People expected age to catch up with Kobe this year and
despite a major dip in FG %, his numbers really didn’t take any sort of hit and
he was able to log quite a few minutes on the floor. However he can’t outrun age forever and it
surely will catch up with most of the Lakers starters this year, limiting their
minutes. Having those capable players,
like a Jordan Hill, that can protect leads and even go on runs while the
starters rest will be crucial for this team’s success.
2. Young
As I’ve said before it is unnerving to look at the Laker
roster because although it is full of stars and solid players much like the
Heat’s roster, it isn’t built for the future like Miami’s is. Jordan Hill won’t
ever be a star, but he shown signs that he could be a solid NBA player. Given
the fact that he only played 7 regular season games with the team, it makes
sense to keep him around for a full season and let me develop. Having some
younger potential to go along with the older talent will help the transition
process when guys like Kobe and Nash retire.
3. Shows Defensive Potential
Hill isn’t a Serge Ibaka or Dwight Howard on the defensive
end, but Jordan Hill has shown a willingness to play defense that isn’t that
common in the league. The fact of the matter is the Lakers current roster has 4
guys that should put up between 70-80 points a game (Nash, Kobe, Gasol, and
Bynum). If you can get 15-20 out of Jamison and Artest then you are looking at
85-100 points from 6 players. Basically the offense isn’t going to be an issue,
but especially since this team is slow and full of notoriously bad defenders
i.e. Nash, Jamison, it helps to have a guy who doesn’t mind playing hard on D.
Jordan Hill is really just a low risk, high reward
investment and there doesn’t seem to be any reason as to why the Lakers
shouldn’t bring him back. Assuming that another team doesn’t give him money
based on potential, the Lakers should be able to re-sign him for cheap and see
if he can develop the way scouts believed he could when he was drafted 8th
overall.
No comments:
Post a Comment